I am also bothered by some of PETA's antics.....they carry things way too far in their ideas about what is right and wrong concerning the keeping of some animals.
I do agree with some of their ideas, such as not buying things made of real animal fur (why should we, when we can get items made of fake fur which look just as nice, and keep us just as warm?) or doing away with puppy mills (which generally treat animals horribly just to make a buck), or even some testing on animals, such as testing to see how some products may poison them, or blind them, etc., etc. However, for the most part their thinking is a bit too extreme for my tastes.
You simply can't say that all testing on animals is a bad thing.... some animal testing can lead to all sorts of medical breakthroughs for people. However, I see no sense in doing things such as putting products in an animal's eyes, to see if it blinds them, or forcing something down their throats, to see if it poisons them, or things like that. If the sort of testing that companies are doing will benefit humans in the long run, and may lead to a cure for certain human diseases, then I see nothing wrong with it, as long as it is done humanely, so that the animals being used are not allowed to suffer unnecessarily.
As far as PETA ever being able to convince the government that keeping pets should not be allowed, I doubt that we'll ever have to worry about that. The number of extremist PETA members are way outnumbered by responsible pet owners, and, given enough leedway, PETA will probably put itself out of business because of all the illegal things that they do in the name of "their cause". At least that is my opinion.
Our legislators are not stupid....and they can surely see that some of PETA's claims are way "off the wall", and, as such, would not be a viable solution to anything!