wes":13byhptf said:Any more updates?
suzuki4life":u3vz6f6i said:wes":u3vz6f6i said:Any more updates?
experiment is pretty well done because temps are rising and I have no intent of putting them in air conditioning to keep temps down...
My findings are that at 64 degrees the dubia never produced less than 2000 nymphs per month.
I also put 15 dubia nymphs in the freezer for 10 hours and they were alive and active within 2 hours. So they survived 28 degrees for 10 hours.
This species is much more hardy than people give them credit.
So, what were your February and March numbers?suzuki4life":3eefx3ox said:experiment is pretty well done because temps are rising and I have no intent of putting them in air conditioning to keep temps down...
My findings are that at 64 degrees the dubia never produced less than 2000 nymphs per month.
wes":304jwp2v said:So, what were your February and March numbers?suzuki4life":304jwp2v said:experiment is pretty well done because temps are rising and I have no intent of putting them in air conditioning to keep temps down...
My findings are that at 64 degrees the dubia never produced less than 2000 nymphs per month.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but you started out with 675 adult females total, and each one averaged about 16 nymphs over four months, or 4 per month.
The number I always hear ballyhooed for females giving birth is 20-40 per month. Yet your females didn't even birth that many over four months. I appreciate that you don't want to air condition them to continue the experiment, but I don't see where your results can prove that they can successfully breed at 64 degrees F. How do you know the results didn't just demonstrate that their metabolism really slows down at that temperature?