DeweysMom":30eo5yxj said:
So if they both displayed the trans gene that's when it would be bad to breed them correct?
Correct :mrgreen:
DeweysMom":30eo5yxj said:
I thought as long as one parent had the trans gene it could get passed down.
That would only be the case if the gene in question was a dominant gene. In the world of genes there is dominant, and their is recessive. The trans gene (or mutation) is a recessive gene, which to put it in more simple terms, it needs more help to show itself as apposed to a dominant gene.
Lets make up a gene, and call it the brandon gene. The brandon gene is dominant. This means that it doesn't really need help in showing itself. So if a Brandon mated with a normal dragon, the result would be some normals, some brandons, and some het. brandons
But, lets make the brandon gene recessive. If the brandon gene mates with a normal, all the dragons will be normal. None of the dragons will show the brandon gene, none of them will even carry it.
If the brandon gene was recessive, the only way it could be passed down to the babies is if both parents carried it in some form. Whether that be a brandon X Het. brandon, or a brandon X brandon.
DeweysMom":30eo5yxj said:
Now as far as this particular breeding, where the parents are both hypo, is that like a double whammy in terms of possible defects?
Not necessarily. Hypo isn't really known to cause problems. While I do agree the trans gene is a mutation, I wouldn't categorize the hypo gene in that same class.
Hypo is also recessive, like translucent. So for there to be any hypo babies, both parents need to be carrying it. Unlike with trans though, a Hypo X Hypo pairing won't lead to serious birth issues. It will just lead to a higher concentration of hatchlings being hypo or Het. Hypo. It won't make a hypo more of a hypo.
I hope this helps. :mrgreen:
-Brandon