icelore":3men79jg said:
You consider someone having a differing opinion based on fact a "big fight"? Each time I've replied to you, I specified legitimate and specific concerns. If you do not want to reply or address those items, that is your choice, but this is a forum, the point is for discourse.
Speaking of limited understanding of what you're talking about - nice attempt to repeat what I just said to you ("limited understanding of closed systems"). Your method of "I've done it, so it's fine" is what doesn't hold water. There are people here who've had dragons on sand for years, and they didn't die of impaction - so it must be fine? There are people who have used compact florescent bulbs without their dragon getting eye problems - so it must be fine as well. There are people who haven't provided the proper UV and yet their dragon didn't develop MBD - so it must be ok too. Faulty logic is faulty logic, no matter how you slice it.
I attempted to engage you on the subject, but if you think it's appropriate to instead revert to sulking in a corner and tossing thinly veiled insults, that's your choice as well.
Enjoy the rest of your time here.
FourNoah - Best of luck with your dragon. The only thing I can suggest is that you do some research of your own and gather opinion of more then one person in an effort to figure out the best course of action.
Haha, no I do not consider a different opinion a big fight, I was merely trying to avoid the chest beating. However, it seems my love of good bourbon does not walk hand in hand with my desire to communicate well. Lets see if I can try that again.
You seem to have two issues with using soil as a substrate.
1) That microbial activity is limited and so it simply wont work well enough to break down the wastes efficiently.
2) That it will create unsafe relative humidity for a bearded dragon.
So lets address those points.
1) Ill skip the part about me not understanding the closed systems (I believe that was one of those thinly veiled insults you were talking about.
Im new here, but in time youll come to see that a lack of research is not something that applies to me). Instead let me say again that this system works, and works well. This is not the same as saying I got away with a poor quality CFL that produces UVC and unnatural short wavelength UVB. Nor is it the same as me saying I didnt provide both a quality source of light in the 295-310 um wavelengths for Vit D metabolite production AND that of 315-335 um UVA1 wavelength light to act as a limiter on this production (starting to see what I mean?). This is me understanding that microbial action is indeed plentiful on the surface because I create the proper conditions for it to thrive. My soil, and this is what I recommend for anyone with soil, is covered in leaf litter, 'furnishings' and debris. This allows for the soil underneath to retain its moisture while not raising the rH, and giving the nitrogen cycling microbes and inverts plenty of humid microhabitats to choose from. When you read further on the topic, which I truly hope you will, youll come to understand that a pile of waste becomes its own microhabitat when deposited. That it is essentially colonized by organisms in the soil and broken down over the course of a few days. The cycle is really quite fascinating, and involves not just coprophagic organisms, but even those that feed on these organisms as well. For instance, the Porcellio scaber in my dragon enclosure do not eat the dragon wastes directly, instead feeding on the fine mold that covers it initially. The Eudrilus eugeniae present eventually eating the results of their wastes and so forth. Now, not only do I know this is happening from research, but I also know this is happening from experience. You see, often times research can be insulated and cause a flawed perspective without experience and repeated testing. So the best knowledge is gained by both careful research and experience. Its why you telling me that there isnt enough microbial activity on the surface of the soil makes me think you might need to actually have some experience to go with your hypothesis. As Im sure you know, thats how the scientific method works; you have an idea and then you test it. My testing shows that indeed it does only take a few days at most and the waste is gone. This is not just my own subjective experience either, but that of the many others I know who use bioactive substrates. (again, thats how the scientific method works - it must be repeatable by others) Id be happy to set up a time lapse shot for you if that would alleviate your concerns. I just got a new GoPro and am always looking for excuses to use it. As I said before, Id also be happy to provide soil samples. I no longer have free access to a testing facility, so if someone else does then please feel free to speak up.
2) I have researched long and hard to find any evidence for this claim. Its one of those pervasive ideas that gets shouted from the rooftops like it were gospel, and just doesnt seem to make any sense for an animal with such a broad range of habitats. In my decades of keeping reptiles Ive also never actually met anyone who had the problem or even known anyone online who actually had this problem themselves. Its always a friend of a friend, or a breeder who someone talked to or some such mythical beast. From what I have been able to find though talking to various vets, the very few times it happened it was only large scale breeders and complete newbs who ever had this issue, and only in enclosures that were kept sterile. Part of what those two groups share in common is a lack of proper attention to the health of particular enclosures. I have never known anyone with a bio active soil who has had this issue, and I now know a great many who keep theirs that way. (You see its not just my own experience Im going off of, its a rather large number of those of us who are researchers and scientists and see the obvious advantages)
The issue seems to be not the humidity itself, but rather the ventilation and the ability of fungus to bloom and potentially cause lung issues. Now, first off let me say that there is no reason to have problems with ventilation in any dragon enclosure. If humidity rises above 50% simply let more air in. This will not be problematic for the dragon or a properly set up soil substrate. The other advantage of a healthy soil substrate over a sterile enclosure is that there is a biological system in place to prevent such unhealthy fungal blooms from occurring. That fungus is food after all, so while you dont have microbes to feed off it in your enclosure, I do. I know this not because I think its true, but because I take all my reptiles in for regular check ups that include fecal and blood testing.
So, if you have further questions about a soil substrate, please feel free to ask them. Im always happy to engage in intelligent conversation, especially if it helps dispel myths that are passed around without being questioned.
Haha, no I do not consider a different opinion a big fight, I was merely trying to avoid the chest beating. However, it seems my love of good bourbon does not walk hand in hand with my desire to communicate well. Lets see if I can try that again.
Added by moderator: Unfriendly sarcasm is breaking the policy on Rude Behavior and will not be tolerated here. If you can't post something nicely, don't post at all.